You may have noticed that in most of the macro definition examples shown above, each occurrence of a macro argument name had parentheses around it. In addition, another pair of parentheses usually surround the entire macro definition. Here is why it is best to write macros that way.

Suppose you define a macro as follows,

#define ceil_div(x, y) (x + y - 1) / y

whose purpose is to divide, rounding up. (One use for this operation is to compute how many `int`

objects are needed to hold a certain number of `char`

objects.) Then suppose it is used as follows:

a = ceil_div (b & c, sizeof (int)); → a = (b & c + sizeof (int) - 1) / sizeof (int);

This does not do what is intended. The operator-precedence rules of C make it equivalent to this:

a = (b & (c + sizeof (int) - 1)) / sizeof (int);

What we want is this:

a = ((b & c) + sizeof (int) - 1)) / sizeof (int);

Defining the macro as

#define ceil_div(x, y) ((x) + (y) - 1) / (y)

provides the desired result.

Unintended grouping can result in another way. Consider ```
sizeof
ceil_div(1, 2)
```

. That has the appearance of a C expression that would compute the size of the type of `ceil_div (1, 2)`

, but in fact it means something very different. Here is what it expands to:

sizeof ((1) + (2) - 1) / (2)

This would take the size of an integer and divide it by two. The precedence rules have put the division outside the `sizeof`

when it was intended to be inside.

Parentheses around the entire macro definition prevent such problems. Here, then, is the recommended way to define `ceil_div`

:

#define ceil_div(x, y) (((x) + (y) - 1) / (y))

Next: Swallowing the Semicolon, Previous: Misnesting, Up: Macro Pitfalls [Contents][Index]

© Free Software Foundation

Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3.

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/cpp/Operator-Precedence-Problems.html