class torch.nn.Upsample(size: Optional[Union[T, Tuple[T, ...]]] = None, scale_factor: Optional[Union[T, Tuple[T, ...]]] = None, mode: str = 'nearest', align_corners: Optional[bool] = None)
[source]
Upsamples a given multi-channel 1D (temporal), 2D (spatial) or 3D (volumetric) data.
The input data is assumed to be of the form minibatch x channels x [optional depth] x [optional height] x width
. Hence, for spatial inputs, we expect a 4D Tensor and for volumetric inputs, we expect a 5D Tensor.
The algorithms available for upsampling are nearest neighbor and linear, bilinear, bicubic and trilinear for 3D, 4D and 5D input Tensor, respectively.
One can either give a scale_factor
or the target output size
to calculate the output size. (You cannot give both, as it is ambiguous)
'nearest'
, 'linear'
, 'bilinear'
, 'bicubic'
and 'trilinear'
. Default: 'nearest'
True
, the corner pixels of the input and output tensors are aligned, and thus preserving the values at those pixels. This only has effect when mode
is 'linear'
, 'bilinear'
, or 'trilinear'
. Default: False
Warning
With align_corners = True
, the linearly interpolating modes (linear
, bilinear
, bicubic
, and trilinear
) don’t proportionally align the output and input pixels, and thus the output values can depend on the input size. This was the default behavior for these modes up to version 0.3.1. Since then, the default behavior is align_corners = False
. See below for concrete examples on how this affects the outputs.
Note
If you want downsampling/general resizing, you should use interpolate()
.
Examples:
>>> input = torch.arange(1, 5, dtype=torch.float32).view(1, 1, 2, 2) >>> input tensor([[[[ 1., 2.], [ 3., 4.]]]]) >>> m = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2, mode='nearest') >>> m(input) tensor([[[[ 1., 1., 2., 2.], [ 1., 1., 2., 2.], [ 3., 3., 4., 4.], [ 3., 3., 4., 4.]]]]) >>> m = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2, mode='bilinear') # align_corners=False >>> m(input) tensor([[[[ 1.0000, 1.2500, 1.7500, 2.0000], [ 1.5000, 1.7500, 2.2500, 2.5000], [ 2.5000, 2.7500, 3.2500, 3.5000], [ 3.0000, 3.2500, 3.7500, 4.0000]]]]) >>> m = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2, mode='bilinear', align_corners=True) >>> m(input) tensor([[[[ 1.0000, 1.3333, 1.6667, 2.0000], [ 1.6667, 2.0000, 2.3333, 2.6667], [ 2.3333, 2.6667, 3.0000, 3.3333], [ 3.0000, 3.3333, 3.6667, 4.0000]]]]) >>> # Try scaling the same data in a larger tensor >>> >>> input_3x3 = torch.zeros(3, 3).view(1, 1, 3, 3) >>> input_3x3[:, :, :2, :2].copy_(input) tensor([[[[ 1., 2.], [ 3., 4.]]]]) >>> input_3x3 tensor([[[[ 1., 2., 0.], [ 3., 4., 0.], [ 0., 0., 0.]]]]) >>> m = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2, mode='bilinear') # align_corners=False >>> # Notice that values in top left corner are the same with the small input (except at boundary) >>> m(input_3x3) tensor([[[[ 1.0000, 1.2500, 1.7500, 1.5000, 0.5000, 0.0000], [ 1.5000, 1.7500, 2.2500, 1.8750, 0.6250, 0.0000], [ 2.5000, 2.7500, 3.2500, 2.6250, 0.8750, 0.0000], [ 2.2500, 2.4375, 2.8125, 2.2500, 0.7500, 0.0000], [ 0.7500, 0.8125, 0.9375, 0.7500, 0.2500, 0.0000], [ 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000]]]]) >>> m = nn.Upsample(scale_factor=2, mode='bilinear', align_corners=True) >>> # Notice that values in top left corner are now changed >>> m(input_3x3) tensor([[[[ 1.0000, 1.4000, 1.8000, 1.6000, 0.8000, 0.0000], [ 1.8000, 2.2000, 2.6000, 2.2400, 1.1200, 0.0000], [ 2.6000, 3.0000, 3.4000, 2.8800, 1.4400, 0.0000], [ 2.4000, 2.7200, 3.0400, 2.5600, 1.2800, 0.0000], [ 1.2000, 1.3600, 1.5200, 1.2800, 0.6400, 0.0000], [ 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000, 0.0000]]]])
© 2019 Torch Contributors
Licensed under the 3-clause BSD License.
https://pytorch.org/docs/1.7.0/generated/torch.nn.Upsample.html