Semi-supervised learning is a situation in which in your training data some of the samples are not labeled. The semi-supervised estimators in
sklearn.semi_supervised are able to make use of this additional unlabeled data to better capture the shape of the underlying data distribution and generalize better to new samples. These algorithms can perform well when we have a very small amount of labeled points and a large amount of unlabeled points.
Unlabeled entries in
It is important to assign an identifier to unlabeled points along with the labeled data when training the model with the
fit method. The identifier that this implementation uses is the integer value \(-1\).
Label propagation denotes a few variations of semi-supervised graph inference algorithms.
LabelSpreading differ in modifications to the similarity matrix that graph and the clamping effect on the label distributions. Clamping allows the algorithm to change the weight of the true ground labeled data to some degree. The
LabelPropagation algorithm performs hard clamping of input labels, which means \(\alpha=0\). This clamping factor can be relaxed, to say \(\alpha=0.2\), which means that we will always retain 80 percent of our original label distribution, but the algorithm gets to change its confidence of the distribution within 20 percent.
LabelPropagation uses the raw similarity matrix constructed from the data with no modifications. In contrast,
LabelSpreading minimizes a loss function that has regularization properties, as such it is often more robust to noise. The algorithm iterates on a modified version of the original graph and normalizes the edge weights by computing the normalized graph Laplacian matrix. This procedure is also used in Spectral clustering.
Label propagation models have two built-in kernel methods. Choice of kernel effects both scalability and performance of the algorithms. The following are available:
The RBF kernel will produce a fully connected graph which is represented in memory by a dense matrix. This matrix may be very large and combined with the cost of performing a full matrix multiplication calculation for each iteration of the algorithm can lead to prohibitively long running times. On the other hand, the KNN kernel will produce a much more memory-friendly sparse matrix which can drastically reduce running times.
 Yoshua Bengio, Olivier Delalleau, Nicolas Le Roux. In Semi-Supervised Learning (2006), pp. 193-216
 Olivier Delalleau, Yoshua Bengio, Nicolas Le Roux. Efficient Non-Parametric Function Induction in Semi-Supervised Learning. AISTAT 2005 http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/nicolasl/efficient_ssl.pdf
© 2007–2018 The scikit-learn developers
Licensed under the 3-clause BSD License.