The goal of this guide is to explore some of the main scikit-learn tools on a single practical task: analyzing a collection of text documents (newsgroups posts) on twenty different topics.
In this section we will see how to:
To get started with this tutorial, you must first install scikit-learn and all of its required dependencies.
Please refer to the installation instructions page for more information and for system-specific instructions.
The source of this tutorial can be found within your scikit-learn folder:
scikit-learn/doc/tutorial/text_analytics/
The source can also be found on Github.
The tutorial folder should contain the following sub-folders:
*.rst files - the source of the tutorial document written with sphinxdata - folder to put the datasets used during the tutorialskeletons - sample incomplete scripts for the exercisessolutions - solutions of the exercisesYou can already copy the skeletons into a new folder somewhere on your hard-drive named sklearn_tut_workspace where you will edit your own files for the exercises while keeping the original skeletons intact:
% cp -r skeletons work_directory/sklearn_tut_workspace
Machine learning algorithms need data. Go to each $TUTORIAL_HOME/data sub-folder and run the fetch_data.py script from there (after having read them first).
For instance:
% cd $TUTORIAL_HOME/data/languages % less fetch_data.py % python fetch_data.py
The dataset is called “Twenty Newsgroups”. Here is the official description, quoted from the website:
The 20 Newsgroups data set is a collection of approximately 20,000 newsgroup documents, partitioned (nearly) evenly across 20 different newsgroups. To the best of our knowledge, it was originally collected by Ken Lang, probably for his paper “Newsweeder: Learning to filter netnews,” though he does not explicitly mention this collection. The 20 newsgroups collection has become a popular data set for experiments in text applications of machine learning techniques, such as text classification and text clustering.In the following we will use the built-in dataset loader for 20 newsgroups from scikit-learn. Alternatively, it is possible to download the dataset manually from the website and use the sklearn.datasets.load_files function by pointing it to the 20news-bydate-train sub-folder of the uncompressed archive folder.
In order to get faster execution times for this first example we will work on a partial dataset with only 4 categories out of the 20 available in the dataset:
>>> categories = ['alt.atheism', 'soc.religion.christian', ... 'comp.graphics', 'sci.med']
We can now load the list of files matching those categories as follows:
>>> from sklearn.datasets import fetch_20newsgroups >>> twenty_train = fetch_20newsgroups(subset='train', ... categories=categories, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
The returned dataset is a scikit-learn “bunch”: a simple holder object with fields that can be both accessed as python dict keys or object attributes for convenience, for instance the target_names holds the list of the requested category names:
>>> twenty_train.target_names ['alt.atheism', 'comp.graphics', 'sci.med', 'soc.religion.christian']
The files themselves are loaded in memory in the data attribute. For reference the filenames are also available:
>>> len(twenty_train.data) 2257 >>> len(twenty_train.filenames) 2257
Let’s print the first lines of the first loaded file:
>>> print("\n".join(twenty_train.data[0].split("\n")[:3]))
From: [email protected] (Michael Collier)
Subject: Converting images to HP LaserJet III?
Nntp-Posting-Host: hampton
>>> print(twenty_train.target_names[twenty_train.target[0]])
comp.graphics
Supervised learning algorithms will require a category label for each document in the training set. In this case the category is the name of the newsgroup which also happens to be the name of the folder holding the individual documents.
For speed and space efficiency reasons scikit-learn loads the target attribute as an array of integers that corresponds to the index of the category name in the target_names list. The category integer id of each sample is stored in the target attribute:
>>> twenty_train.target[:10] array([1, 1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2])
It is possible to get back the category names as follows:
>>> for t in twenty_train.target[:10]: ... print(twenty_train.target_names[t]) ... comp.graphics comp.graphics soc.religion.christian soc.religion.christian soc.religion.christian soc.religion.christian soc.religion.christian sci.med sci.med sci.med
You might have noticed that the samples were shuffled randomly when we called fetch_20newsgroups(..., shuffle=True, random_state=42): this is useful if you wish to select only a subset of samples to quickly train a model and get a first idea of the results before re-training on the complete dataset later.
In order to perform machine learning on text documents, we first need to turn the text content into numerical feature vectors.
The most intuitive way to do so is to use a bags of words representation:
#i, count the number of occurrences of each word w and store it in X[i, j] as the value of feature #j where j is the index of word w in the dictionary.The bags of words representation implies that n_features is the number of distinct words in the corpus: this number is typically larger than 100,000.
If n_samples == 10000, storing X as a NumPy array of type float32 would require 10000 x 100000 x 4 bytes = 4GB in RAM which is barely manageable on today’s computers.
Fortunately, most values in X will be zeros since for a given document less than a few thousand distinct words will be used. For this reason we say that bags of words are typically high-dimensional sparse datasets. We can save a lot of memory by only storing the non-zero parts of the feature vectors in memory.
scipy.sparse matrices are data structures that do exactly this, and scikit-learn has built-in support for these structures.
scikit-learn
Text preprocessing, tokenizing and filtering of stopwords are all included in CountVectorizer, which builds a dictionary of features and transforms documents to feature vectors:
>>> from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer >>> count_vect = CountVectorizer() >>> X_train_counts = count_vect.fit_transform(twenty_train.data) >>> X_train_counts.shape (2257, 35788)
CountVectorizer supports counts of N-grams of words or consecutive characters. Once fitted, the vectorizer has built a dictionary of feature indices:
>>> count_vect.vocabulary_.get(u'algorithm') 4690
The index value of a word in the vocabulary is linked to its frequency in the whole training corpus.
Occurrence count is a good start but there is an issue: longer documents will have higher average count values than shorter documents, even though they might talk about the same topics.
To avoid these potential discrepancies it suffices to divide the number of occurrences of each word in a document by the total number of words in the document: these new features are called tf for Term Frequencies.
Another refinement on top of tf is to downscale weights for words that occur in many documents in the corpus and are therefore less informative than those that occur only in a smaller portion of the corpus.
This downscaling is called tf–idf for “Term Frequency times Inverse Document Frequency”.
Both tf and tf–idf can be computed as follows using TfidfTransformer:
>>> from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import TfidfTransformer >>> tf_transformer = TfidfTransformer(use_idf=False).fit(X_train_counts) >>> X_train_tf = tf_transformer.transform(X_train_counts) >>> X_train_tf.shape (2257, 35788)
In the above example-code, we firstly use the fit(..) method to fit our estimator to the data and secondly the transform(..) method to transform our count-matrix to a tf-idf representation. These two steps can be combined to achieve the same end result faster by skipping redundant processing. This is done through using the fit_transform(..) method as shown below, and as mentioned in the note in the previous section:
>>> tfidf_transformer = TfidfTransformer() >>> X_train_tfidf = tfidf_transformer.fit_transform(X_train_counts) >>> X_train_tfidf.shape (2257, 35788)
Now that we have our features, we can train a classifier to try to predict the category of a post. Let’s start with a naïve Bayes classifier, which provides a nice baseline for this task. scikit-learn includes several variants of this classifier; the one most suitable for word counts is the multinomial variant:
>>> from sklearn.naive_bayes import MultinomialNB >>> clf = MultinomialNB().fit(X_train_tfidf, twenty_train.target)
To try to predict the outcome on a new document we need to extract the features using almost the same feature extracting chain as before. The difference is that we call transform instead of fit_transform on the transformers, since they have already been fit to the training set:
>>> docs_new = ['God is love', 'OpenGL on the GPU is fast']
>>> X_new_counts = count_vect.transform(docs_new)
>>> X_new_tfidf = tfidf_transformer.transform(X_new_counts)
>>> predicted = clf.predict(X_new_tfidf)
>>> for doc, category in zip(docs_new, predicted):
... print('%r => %s' % (doc, twenty_train.target_names[category]))
...
'God is love' => soc.religion.christian
'OpenGL on the GPU is fast' => comp.graphics
In order to make the vectorizer => transformer => classifier easier to work with, scikit-learn provides a Pipeline class that behaves like a compound classifier:
>>> from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
>>> text_clf = Pipeline([('vect', CountVectorizer()),
... ('tfidf', TfidfTransformer()),
... ('clf', MultinomialNB()),
... ])
The names vect, tfidf and clf (classifier) are arbitrary. We will use them to perform grid search for suitable hyperparameters below. We can now train the model with a single command:
>>> text_clf.fit(twenty_train.data, twenty_train.target) Pipeline(...)
Evaluating the predictive accuracy of the model is equally easy:
>>> import numpy as np >>> twenty_test = fetch_20newsgroups(subset='test', ... categories=categories, shuffle=True, random_state=42) >>> docs_test = twenty_test.data >>> predicted = text_clf.predict(docs_test) >>> np.mean(predicted == twenty_test.target) 0.8348...
We achieved 83.5% accuracy. Let’s see if we can do better with a linear support vector machine (SVM), which is widely regarded as one of the best text classification algorithms (although it’s also a bit slower than naïve Bayes). We can change the learner by simply plugging a different classifier object into our pipeline:
>>> from sklearn.linear_model import SGDClassifier
>>> text_clf = Pipeline([('vect', CountVectorizer()),
... ('tfidf', TfidfTransformer()),
... ('clf', SGDClassifier(loss='hinge', penalty='l2',
... alpha=1e-3, random_state=42,
... max_iter=5, tol=None)),
... ])
>>> text_clf.fit(twenty_train.data, twenty_train.target)
Pipeline(...)
>>> predicted = text_clf.predict(docs_test)
>>> np.mean(predicted == twenty_test.target)
0.9127...
We achieved 91.3% accuracy using the SVM. scikit-learn provides further utilities for more detailed performance analysis of the results:
>>> from sklearn import metrics
>>> print(metrics.classification_report(twenty_test.target, predicted,
... target_names=twenty_test.target_names))
...
precision recall f1-score support
alt.atheism 0.95 0.81 0.87 319
comp.graphics 0.88 0.97 0.92 389
sci.med 0.94 0.90 0.92 396
soc.religion.christian 0.90 0.95 0.93 398
micro avg 0.91 0.91 0.91 1502
macro avg 0.92 0.91 0.91 1502
weighted avg 0.92 0.91 0.91 1502
>>> metrics.confusion_matrix(twenty_test.target, predicted)
array([[258, 11, 15, 35],
[ 4, 379, 3, 3],
[ 5, 33, 355, 3],
[ 5, 10, 4, 379]])
As expected the confusion matrix shows that posts from the newsgroups on atheism and Christianity are more often confused for one another than with computer graphics.
We’ve already encountered some parameters such as use_idf in the TfidfTransformer. Classifiers tend to have many parameters as well; e.g., MultinomialNB includes a smoothing parameter alpha and SGDClassifier has a penalty parameter alpha and configurable loss and penalty terms in the objective function (see the module documentation, or use the Python help function to get a description of these).
Instead of tweaking the parameters of the various components of the chain, it is possible to run an exhaustive search of the best parameters on a grid of possible values. We try out all classifiers on either words or bigrams, with or without idf, and with a penalty parameter of either 0.01 or 0.001 for the linear SVM:
>>> from sklearn.model_selection import GridSearchCV
>>> parameters = {'vect__ngram_range': [(1, 1), (1, 2)],
... 'tfidf__use_idf': (True, False),
... 'clf__alpha': (1e-2, 1e-3),
... }
Obviously, such an exhaustive search can be expensive. If we have multiple CPU cores at our disposal, we can tell the grid searcher to try these eight parameter combinations in parallel with the n_jobs parameter. If we give this parameter a value of -1, grid search will detect how many cores are installed and use them all:
>>> gs_clf = GridSearchCV(text_clf, parameters, cv=5, iid=False, n_jobs=-1)
The grid search instance behaves like a normal scikit-learn model. Let’s perform the search on a smaller subset of the training data to speed up the computation:
>>> gs_clf = gs_clf.fit(twenty_train.data[:400], twenty_train.target[:400])
The result of calling fit on a GridSearchCV object is a classifier that we can use to predict:
>>> twenty_train.target_names[gs_clf.predict(['God is love'])[0]] 'soc.religion.christian'
The object’s best_score_ and best_params_ attributes store the best mean score and the parameters setting corresponding to that score:
>>> gs_clf.best_score_
0.9...
>>> for param_name in sorted(parameters.keys()):
... print("%s: %r" % (param_name, gs_clf.best_params_[param_name]))
...
clf__alpha: 0.001
tfidf__use_idf: True
vect__ngram_range: (1, 2)
A more detailed summary of the search is available at gs_clf.cv_results_.
The cv_results_ parameter can be easily imported into pandas as a DataFrame for further inspection.
To do the exercises, copy the content of the ‘skeletons’ folder as a new folder named ‘workspace’:
% cp -r skeletons workspace
You can then edit the content of the workspace without fear of losing the original exercise instructions.
Then fire an ipython shell and run the work-in-progress script with:
[1] %run workspace/exercise_XX_script.py arg1 arg2 arg3
If an exception is triggered, use %debug to fire-up a post mortem ipdb session.
Refine the implementation and iterate until the exercise is solved.
For each exercise, the skeleton file provides all the necessary import statements, boilerplate code to load the data and sample code to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the model.
CharNGramAnalyzer using data from Wikipedia articles as training set.ipython command line:
%run workspace/exercise_01_language_train_model.py data/languages/paragraphs/
ipython command line:
%run workspace/exercise_02_sentiment.py data/movie_reviews/txt_sentoken/
Using the results of the previous exercises and the cPickle module of the standard library, write a command line utility that detects the language of some text provided on stdin and estimate the polarity (positive or negative) if the text is written in English.
Bonus point if the utility is able to give a confidence level for its predictions.
Here are a few suggestions to help further your scikit-learn intuition upon the completion of this tutorial:
analyzer and token normalisation under CountVectorizer.CountVectorizer.
© 2007–2018 The scikit-learn developers
Licensed under the 3-clause BSD License.
http://scikit-learn.org/stable/tutorial/text_analytics/working_with_text_data.html