In the previous section, the definition of for
was fixed as follows to make the expansion evaluate the macro arguments the proper number of times:
(defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body) "Execute a simple for loop: (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))."
`(let ((,var ,init) (max ,final)) (while (<= ,var max) ,@body (inc ,var))))
The new definition of for
has a new problem: it introduces a local variable named max
which the user does not expect. This causes trouble in examples such as the following:
(let ((max 0)) (for x from 0 to 10 do (let ((this (frob x))) (if (< max this) (setq max this)))))
The references to max
inside the body of the for
, which are supposed to refer to the user’s binding of max
, really access the binding made by for
.
The way to correct this is to use an uninterned symbol instead of max
(see Creating Symbols). The uninterned symbol can be bound and referred to just like any other symbol, but since it is created by for
, we know that it cannot already appear in the user’s program. Since it is not interned, there is no way the user can put it into the program later. It will never appear anywhere except where put by for
. Here is a definition of for
that works this way:
(defmacro for (var from init to final do &rest body) "Execute a simple for loop: (for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))." (let ((tempvar (make-symbol "max"))) `(let ((,var ,init) (,tempvar ,final)) (while (<= ,var ,tempvar) ,@body (inc ,var)))))
This creates an uninterned symbol named max
and puts it in the expansion instead of the usual interned symbol max
that appears in expressions ordinarily.
Copyright © 1990-1996, 1998-2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Licensed under the GNU GPL license.
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Surprising-Local-Vars.html