/C

# Increment/decrement operators

Increment/decrement operators are unary operators that increment/decrement the value of a variable by 1.

They can have postfix form:

 expr `++` expr `--`

As well as the prefix form:

 `++` expr `--` expr

The operand expr of both prefix and postfix increment or decrement must be a modifiable lvalue of integer type (including `_Bool` and enums), real floating type, or a pointer type. It may be cvr-qualified, unqualified, or atomic.

The result of the postfix increment and decrement operators is the value of expr.

The result of the prefix increment operator is the result of adding the value `1` to the value of expr: the expression `++e` is equivalent to `e+=1`. The result of the prefix decrement operator is the result of subtracting the value `1` from the value of expr: the expression `--e` is equivalent to `e-=1`.

Increment operators initiate the side-effect of adding the value `1` of appropriate type to the operand. Decrement operators initiate the side-effect of subtracting the value `1` of appropriate type from the operand. As with any other side-effects, these operations complete at or before the next sequence point. `int a = 1; int b = a++; // stores 1+a (which is 2) to a // returns the value of a (which is 1) // After this line, b == 1 and a == 2 a = 1; int c = ++a; // stores 1+a (which is 2) to a // returns 1+a (which is 2) // after this line, c == 2 and a == 2`.

 Post-increment or post-decrement on any atomic variable is an atomic read-modify-write operation with memory order `memory_order_seq_cst`. (since C11)

See arithmetic operators for limitations on pointer arithmetic, as well as for implicit conversions applied to the operands.

Because of the side-effects involved, increment and decrement operators must be used with care to avoid undefined behavior due to violations of sequencing rules.

Increment/decrement operators are not defined for complex or imaginary types: the usual definition of adding/subtracting the real number 1 would have no effect on imaginary types, and making it add/subtract `i` for imaginaries but `1` for complex numbers would have made it handle `0+yi` different from `yi`.

Unlike C++ (and some implementations of C), the increment/decrement expressions are never themselves lvalues: `&++a` is invalid.

### Example

```#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main(void) {

int a = 1;
int b = 1;

printf("\n");
printf("original values: a == %d, b == %d\n", a, b);
printf("result of postfix operators: a++ == %d, b-- == %d\n", a++, b--);
printf("after postfix operators applied: a == %d, b == %d\n", a, b);

// Reset a and b.
a = 1;
b = 1;

printf("\n");
printf("original values: a == %d, b == %d\n", a, b);
printf("result of prefix operators: ++a == %d, --b == %d\n", ++a, --b);
printf("after prefix operators applied: a == %d, b == %d\n", a, b);
}```

Output:

```original values: a == 1, b == 1
result of postfix operators: a++ == 1, b-- == 1
after postfix operators applied: a == 2, b == 0

original values: a == 1, b == 1
result of prefix operators: ++a == 2, --b == 0
after prefix operators applied: a == 2, b == 0```
• C11 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:2011):
• 6.5.2.4 Postfix increment and decrement operators (p: 85)
• 6.5.3.1 Prefix increment and decrement operators (p: 88)
• C99 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:1999):
• 6.5.2.4 Postfix increment and decrement operators (p: 75)
• 6.5.3.1 Prefix increment and decrement operators (p: 78)
• C89/C90 standard (ISO/IEC 9899:1990):
• 3.3.2.4 Postfix increment and decrement operators
• 3.3.3.1 Prefix increment and decrement operators

Common operators
assignment increment
decrement
arithmetic logical comparison member
access
other

`a = b a += b a -= b a *= b a /= b a %= b a &= b a |= b a ^= b a <<= b a >>= b`.

`++a --a a++ a--`

`+a -a a + b a - b a * b a / b a % b ~a a & b a | b a ^ b a << b a >> b`.

`!a a && b a || b`.

`a == b a != b a < b a > b a <= b a >= b`.

`a[b] *a &a a->b a.b`.

`a(...) a, b (type) a ? : sizeof _Alignof` (since C11).