Definitions are declarations that fully define the entity introduced by the declaration. Every declaration is a definition, except for the following:
int f(int); // declares, but doesn't define f
extern
storage class specifier or with a language linkage specifier (such as extern "C"
) without an initializer: extern const int a; // declares, but doesn't define a extern const int b = 1; // defines b
struct S { int n; // defines S::n static int i; // declares, but doesn't define S::i inline static int x; // defines S::x }; // defines S int S::i; // defines S::i
struct S { static constexpr int x = 42; // implicitly inline, defines S::x }; constexpr int S::x; // declares S::x, not a redefinition | (since C++17) |
struct S; // declares, but doesn't define S class Y f(class T p); // declares, but doesn't define Y and T (and also f and p)
enum Color : int; // declares, but doesn't define Color | (since C++11) |
template<typename T> // declares, but doesn't define T
int f(int x); // declares, but doesn't define f and x int f(int x) // defines f and x { return x + a; }
typedef S S2; // declares, but doesn't define S2 (S may be incomplete)
using S2 = S; // declares, but doesn't define S2 (S may be incomplete) | (since C++11) |
using N::d; // declares, but doesn't define d
| (since C++17) |
| (since C++11) |
extern template f<int, char>; // declares, but doesn't define f<int, char> | (since C++11) |
template<> struct A<int>; // declares, but doesn't define A<int>
An asm declaration does not define any entities, but it is classified as a definition.
Where necessary, the compiler may implicitly define the default constructor, copy constructor, move constructor, copy assignment operator, move assignment operator, and the destructor.
If the definition of any object results in an object of incomplete type or abstract class type, the program is ill-formed.
Only one definition of any variable, function, class type, enumeration type, concept (since C++20) or template is allowed in any one translation unit (some of these may have multiple declarations, but only one definition is allowed).
One and only one definition of every non-inline function or variable that is odr-used (see below) is required to appear in the entire program (including any standard and user-defined libraries). The compiler is not required to diagnose this violation, but the behavior of the program that violates it is undefined.
For an inline function or inline variable (since C++17), a definition is required in every translation unit where it is odr-used.
For a class, a definition is required wherever the class is used in a way that requires it to be complete.
There can be more than one definition in a program of each of the following: class type, enumeration type, inline function, inline variable (since C++17), templated entity (template or member of template, but not full template specialization), as long as all of the following is true:
| (since C++20) |
| (since C++11) |
const
object is constant-initialized in any of the definitions, it is constant-initialized in each definition
| (since C++20) |
If all these requirements are satisfied, the program behaves as if there is only one definition in the entire program. Otherwise, the program is ill-formed, no diagnostic required.
Note: in C, there is no program-wide ODR for types, and even extern declarations of the same variable in different translation units may have different types as long as they are compatible. In C++, the source-code tokens used in declarations of the same type must be the same as described above: if one .cpp file defines struct S { int x; };
and the other .cpp file defines struct S { int y; };
, the behavior of the program that links them together is undefined. This is usually resolved with unnamed namespaces.
Informally,
If an object, a reference or a function is odr-used, its definition must exist somewhere in the program; a violation of that is usually a link-time error.
struct S { static const int x = 0; // static data member // a definition outside of class is required if it is odr-used }; const int& f(const int& r); int n = b ? (1, S::x) // S::x is not odr-used here : f(S::x); // S::x is odr-used here: a definition is required
Formally,
1) a variablex
in a potentially-evaluated expression ex
is odr-used unless both of the following are true: x
yields a constant expression that doesn't invoke non-trivial functions x
is not an object (that is, x
is a reference) or, if x
is an object, it is one of the potential results of a larger expression e
, where that larger expression is either a discarded-value expression or has the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion applied to it struct S { static const int x = 1; }; // applying lvalue-to-rvalue conversion // to S::x yields a constant expression int f() { S::x; // discarded-value expression does not odr-use S::x return S::x; // expression where lvalue-to-rvalue conversion // applies does not odr-use S::x }
*this
is odr-used if this
appears as a potentially-evaluated expression (including the implicit this
in a non-static member function call expression)3) A structured binding is odr-used if it appears as a potentially-evaluated expression. | (since C++17) |
A set of potential results of an expression E
is a (possibly empty) set of id-expressions that appear within E
, combined as follows:
E
is an id-expression, the expression E
is its only potential result. E
is a subscript expression (E1[E2]
) where one of the operands is an array, the potential results of that operand is included in the set. E
is a class member access expression of the form E1.E2
or E1.template E2
naming a non-static data member, the potential results of E1
is included in the set. E
is a class member access expression naming a static data member, the id-expression designating the data member is included in the set. E
is a pointer-to-member access expression of the form E1.*E2
or E1.*template E2
whose second operand is a constant expression, the potential results of E1
are included in the set. E
is an expression in parentheses ((E1)
), the potential results of E1
are included in the set. E
is a glvalue conditional expression (E1 ? E2 : E3
, where E2
and E3
are glvalues), the union of the potential results of E2
and E3
are both included in the set. E
is a comma expression (E1, E2
), the potential results of E2
are in the set of potential results. struct S { static const int a = 1; static const int b = 2; }; int f(bool x) { return x ? S::a : S::b; // x is a part of the subexpression "x" (to the left of ?), // which applies lvalue-to-rvalue conversion, but applying that conversion to x // does not yield a constant expression, so x is odr-used // S::a and S::b are lvalues, and carry over as "potential results" // to the result of the glvalue conditional // That result is then subject to lvalue-to-rvalue conversion requested // to copy-initialize the return value, therefore S::a and S::b are not odr-used }
T
that is a member or base of another class U
is odr-used by an implicitly-defined copy-assignment or move-assignment functions of U
. A function is named by an expression or conversion in following cases:
operator new
, non-default initialization) is named by that expression if it is selected by overload resolution, except when it is an unqualified pure virtual member function or a pointer-to-member to a pure virtual function. A potentially evaluated expression or conversion odr-uses a function if it names it.
A potentially constant evaluated expression or conversion that names a constexpr function makes it needed for constant evaluation, which triggers definition of a defaulted function or instantiation of a function template specialization, even if the expression is unevaluated. | (since C++11) |
The following behavior-changing defect reports were applied retroactively to previously published C++ standards.
DR | Applied to | Behavior as published | Correct behavior |
---|---|---|---|
CWG 261 | C++98 | a deallocation function for a polymorphic class might be odr-used even if there were no relevant new or delete expressions in the program | supplemented the odr-use cases to cover constructors and destructors |
CWG 678 | C++98 | an entity could have definitions with different language linkages | the behavior is undefined in this case |
CWG 1472 | C++98 | reference variables which satisfy the requirements for appearing in a constant expression were odr-used even if the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is immediately applied | they are not odr-used in this case |
CWG 1614 | C++98 | taking address of a pure virtual function odr-used it | the function is not odr-used |
CWG 1741 | C++98 | constant objects that are immediately lvalue-to-rvalue converted in potentially-evaluated expressions were odr-used | they are not odr-used |
CWG 1926 | C++98 | array subscript expressions didn't propagate potential results | they propagate |
CWG 2242 | C++98 | it was unclear whether a const object that is onlyconstant-initialized in part of its definitions violates ODR | ODR is not violated; the object is constant-initialized in this case |
CWG 2300 | C++11 | lambda expressions in different translation units could never have the same closure type | the closure type can be the same under one definition rule |
CWG 2353 | C++98 | a static data member was not a potential result of a member access expression accessing it | it is |
CWG 2433 | C++14 | a variable template could not have multiple definitions in a program | it can |
© cppreference.com
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike Unported License v3.0.
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/definition